The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
Women requires that women be accorded rights equal to those of men and
that women be able to enjoy all their rights in practice. While international
human rights treaties refer to “equality”, in other sectors the term “equity”
is often used.
The term “gender equity” has sometimes been used in a way that perpetuates
stereotypes about women’s role in society, suggesting that women should
be treated “fairly” in accordance with the roles that they carry out.18 This
understanding risks perpetuating unequal gender relations and solidifying
gender stereotypes that are detrimental to women. The Committee on
the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has emphasized in
its general recommendations and concluding observations on different
countries, e.g., in its general recommendation No. 28 (2010) on the core
obligations of States parties under article 2 of the Convention, that “States parties are called upon to use exclusively the concepts of equality of
women and men or gender equality and not to use the concept of gender
equity in implementing their obligations under the Convention.” As the
legal term used in the Convention, gender equality cannot be replaced by
equity, which is a concept conditioned by subjective criteria.
Some stakeholders have also favoured the language of equity on the
misunderstanding that gender equality means the same or identical
treatment of men and women, rather than taking into account the actual
circumstances of men and women. As explained above, substantive
equality, which is the standard to be met under human rights law, requires
measures to achieve equality of results. This may mean that women and
men are not always treated in exactly the same manner, in order to redress
historical discrimination and/or take account of women’s biological
differences.
http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HR-PUB-14-2.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.