Amongst defenders we found different reactions to
questions about ‘mental and emotional wellbeing’ in our
study. Some defenders interpreted this as a ‘Western’
concept, leading to ‘Western’ interventions that were
inappropriate for them.
As a leader of an indigenous community in Colombia said:
We don’t really use the ‘psychosocial’ concept. We
believe that the work we do as indigenous people is
better for us. We are all in our right minds; we all have
our five senses; we are not crazy. Just because there
are armed groups present, it doesn’t mean we are in
a bad way.
However… there were 18-20 suicides in the last four
years… We have tried ‘Western’ psychology, but it didn’t
improve matters. The indigenous medics have blessed us
and offered advice. This has been better for us.
Defenders in our study noted that it was sometimes
difficult to hold discussions about wellbeing with fellow
defenders because it was perceived to be linked with
‘madness’ or needing to see a psychiatrist. Those who
recognized the value of counselling and treatment noted
difficulties with accessing these forms of support as well
as the stigma associated with these. Others felt that
locally relevant cultural and religious forms of support
were more effective for them.
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER HUB POLICY BRIEF 1 | JANUARY 2017-University of York
This Policy Brief is based on research findings from the project ‘Navigating Risk, Managing Security, and Receiving Support’ which examines the experiences of human rights defenders at risk in Colombia, Mexico, Egypt, Kenya, and Indonesia. Interviews and surveys were conducted with over 400 defenders between July 2015 and November 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.