There is a link between the identity of defenders, the
risks they face, and the resources and support they are
able to access for their wellbeing. LGBTIQ* defenders, for
example, have narrower access to support mechanisms.
Seeking support outside of their own circles often requires
them to ‘come out’ and to expose the work they do.
This is similar for women defenders working on sensitive
issues. As such, their spaces of work remain one of the
few spaces for strengthening wellbeing.
[After the attack] I decided to go home to where
my parents are; it was bad, a lot of stigma and
discrimination from my family. They called me
despicable. “You have dropped our name to mud, we
are ashamed of you, you have dropped our name to
mud, you have no shame, God will see you through hell.”
It was so hard I wanted to commit suicide. I could not
proceed with my work at that time. There was a state
of panic and risk for all the LGBTIs [in my area]. I stayed
underground until things were safe.
Transwoman defender working on LGBTIQ*
rights in Kenya
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER HUB POLICY BRIEF 1 | JANUARY 2017-University of York
This Policy Brief is based on research findings from the project ‘Navigating Risk, Managing Security, and Receiving Support’ which examines the experiences of human rights defenders at risk in Colombia, Mexico, Egypt, Kenya, and Indonesia. Interviews and surveys were conducted with over 400 defenders between July 2015 and November 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.